Click for Text-Only version
Back to CUA Home
CUA Department of Psychology
 

 
Collage of Pictures

Welcome Letter

Undergraduate Programs

Graduate Programs

Research

Faculty

News & Events

Courses & Schedules

Admissions

Alumni

Career Opportunities

CUA in Washington

CUA Home    Home    Site Map    Contact Us    Text Only     Calendar

CSL Notes

A quarterly newsletter of the Cognitive Science Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C. 20064.

FROM THE EDITOR..........

Carol Cairns

brain with backwards propeller beanie Take a look at a possible CSL logo merging the "Propeller Heads" with the "Brain Heads" as Raja designated the Human Factors and Cognitive Neuroscience divisions in the last issue. Yang "unveiled" her creation at the February 4th Lab Meeting which Raja led with his discussion of "Neuroergonomics, the Study of Brain and Behavior at Work" (see THE DIRECTOR SPEAKS). Very creative, Yang!

This issue re-introduces a feature from past issues, THE GUEST COLUMN, with a contribution this month from John Deaton, a CSL alumnus. Additionally, Jacqueline Duley submitted an IN MY OPINION article. In hope of making both regular features, I invite all readers of "CSL NOTES" to participate; we also invite your comments on our newsletter and, from CSL alumni, updates on your what avenues your life/career have taken you. Fax, mail, or e-mail any contributions to me.

Check CSL NEWS for alumni updates: two CSL babies were born in November: Cory Harrison Byrne on the 14th and Cassidy Madeline Hilburn (who debuted six weeks early!) on the 30th, and, on a sad note, Toufik Bahri passed away November 17, 1997, of cancer.

Work progresses on the flight simulator and ATC stations in G-8 where subject testing has progressed with air traffic controllers. And data collection continues on the aging grants. With new additions to the CSL staff (see CSL NEWS), we are bursting at the seams on the second floor, as we continue to be a productive research team (see NEW PUBLICATIONS and conference/presentation reports). Raja has two books ready to hit the bookshelves: The Future of Air Traffic Control. Human Operators and Automation, the second in a series of reports by the Panel on Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Automation of which Raja is a member and The Attentive Brain, which Raja edited and will be [hopefully] off the presses in time for the Cognitive Neuroscience Society meeting in San Francisco in April.

Check out the topics of our regular Wednesday lab meetings. This will continue, as introduced in the last issue of "CSL NOTES" to be a regular feature. All readers are invited to attend.

subject waiting area photo

Subject waiting area in G-6. Thanks to Jackie for donating a rug and picture to make the area a little more warm and comfortable.


THE DIRECTOR SPEAKS on..........NEUROERGONOMICS: The Study of Brain and Behavior at Work

Raja Parasuraman

What is Neuroergonomics?

Neuroergonomics is the study of brain and behavior at work. This interdisciplinary field is concerned with investigations of the neural bases of human perception, cognition, and performance in relation to systems and technologies in the "real world", for example, in the use of computers and various other machines at home or in the workplace, and in operating vehicles such as aircraft, cars, trains, and ships. Neuroergonomics has two major goals: (1) to use existing and emerging knowledge of human performance and brain function to design such systems for safer and more efficient operation; and (2) to advance understanding of human brain function in relation to cognitive processes and performance in real-world tasks.

Historical Background.

The constituent disciplines of neuroergonomics are neuroscience and ergonomics (or human factors). Both are twentieth-century, post World War II fields, and the rise of both areas can be linked to technological developments, particularly digital computers, initiated by engineers and physicists.

Traditionally, ergonomics has not paid much attention to neuroscience or to the results of studies concerning brain mechanisms underlying human perceptual, cognitive, affective, and motor processes. At the same time, neuroscience, and its more recent off-shoot, cognitive neuroscience, has only been partially concerned with whether its findings bear any relation to human functioning in real (as opposed to laboratory) settings, with the exception of applications to clinical disorders. Neuroergonomics is a response to this twin disregard.

The relative neglect by ergonomics of human brain function is consistent with a functionalist approach to the philosophy of mind. Such an approach implies that the characteristics of neural structure and functioning are largely irrelevant to the development of theories of mental functioning. In contrast, cognitive neuroscience suggests that such characteristics constrain and in some cases determine theories of human mental processes.

The relative neglect by neuroscience of applications in ergonomics can be traced to the recency of the field. There is also a tendency to think of applications of neuroscience solely to understanding abnormalities of mental function, that is, to neurological and psychiatric disorders such as dementia and schizophrenia. But if cognitive neuroscience is the study of the neural basis of mental functions, then there is no reason why applications to normal functioning in the real world cannot be examined.

Neuroergonomics: The Merging of Ergonomics and Cognitive Neuroscience

Cognitive neuroscience and ergonomics are exciting fields because both may be poised for a Great Leap Forward in the 21st century. The 1990s were declared the "Decade of the Brain" by the White House, and there is tremendous excitement at the prospect of arriving at a deep understanding of the neural basis of cognition in the years ahead. As this decade comes to an end, a proposal has been made to declare the years 2000-2010 the "Decade of Behavior" to emphasize the importance of understanding mechanisms of human behavior to several key societal problems. At the same time, ergonomics is coming of age in terms of its increasing acceptance by industry. There is now at least tacit recognition that any device or system that is used by humans, from small consumer items such as personal computers to large systems such as jet aircraft, cannot be effectively operated without adequate consideration of ergonomics and human factors in the design process.

Currently, cognitive neuroscience and ergonomics are disparate disciplines, and their goals are such that they rarely interact. Neuroergonomics represents the merger and extension of these goals in new directions. To the extent that cognitive neuroscience advances theoretical knowledge on human functioning, it can influence the application of that knowledge to the design of systems. At the same time, ergonomics may provide an avenue for examining the practical utility of basic findings generated by cognitive neuroscientists. The shift from the Decade of the Brain to the proposed Decade of Behavior provides an appropriate background for promoting a new discipline devoted to examining both brain and behavior in relation to work.

Examples of Neuroergonomics Research.

What kinds of research work falls within the domain of neuroergonomics? Here are some examples.

  • Using knowledge of brain mechanisms and neurochemical systems that control circadian rhythms to devise optimal schedules for shift work or to minimize circadian disruption due to travel across time zones.
  • Developing functional brain imaging measures of cerebral blood flow to index mental workload during complex, multi-task performance so as to optimize the design of human-machine systems.
  • Using event-related brain potentials to examine individual differences in attentional abilities in younger and older pilots.
  • Examining cortical mechanisms of human motivation in relation to attention and job performance.
  • Developing animal models of human vigilance or sustained attention to discover the neural mechanisms underlying performance decrement during long-duration tasks such as those in aviation and air-traffic control.
  • Understanding the neural basis of performance of real-world, complex perceptual-motor tasks such as driving.
  • Exploring the neural basis of human error patterns using event-related brain potentials and functional brain imaging.

More development-oriented work might include the following:

  • Applying knowledge of brain and cognitive architectures to produce "neural chips" (as opposed to traditional VLSI architectures) that could produce intelligent user interfaces with exceptionally fast computing systems. These could be used to develop "neuroergonomic aids" for the physically incapacitated.
  • Using new insights into the computational and neural basis of spatial navigation to develop improved virtual reality systems.
  • Using real-time measurement of brain electrical potentials for adaptive control of computer interfaces by the physically disabled.
  • Developing improved robots for underwater and ocean-floor search based on principles of echolocation used by dolphins.

Future Directions.

At the moment, neuroergonomics is only an idea whose time has come. But there appears to be a core group of investigators who have made significant contributions that can legitimately be associated with this nascent field. Neuroergonomics offers researchers an avenue for exercising their budding interests.

I should like to solicit your opinions on the ideas presented here. Is neuroergonomics viable? Would it be useful to form an informal association of researchers with interests in this area? What might be possible methods for further developing this idea? A small conference? A journal? A web-based discussion group?

If you can think of others who would be interested in joining this interest group, please pass on this on to them or give them our web address (http://www.cua.edu/org/csl/neuroerg.cfm) where they will find this document. Responses and feedback would be welcome. Address comments to me c/o Cognitive Science Lab, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064; or you can either e-mail (parasuraman@cua.edu) or fax (202-319-4456) your comments. Your interest is appreciated.

REPORT ON SOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE 27TH ANNUAL MEETING..........

Yang Jiang

More than 29,000 "neural heads" from all over the world attended the 27th annual meeting of Society for Neuroscience in New Orleans, October 25-30. Attention and the neural basis of attention remained the hot topics and stimulated much work by neuroscientists at the conference, especially cognitive neuroscientists. Raja chaired a session on selective attention. Another speaker in the session was CSL alumnus Scott Adams who presented "Electrophysiological attention signals in three sense modalities" co-authored with Wesdorp at NIAAA and Raja. Also from the CSL, Pam and Raja's poster "Changes in the ability to dynamically adjust the attention focus from young to old age to Alzheimer's disease" was presented in one of the sessions on Alzheimer's.

The keynote speaker was Dr. Goldman-Rakic, who spoke on "Working memory". She and her colleagues not only have explored working memory in monkeys using single-cell recording, but also have taken the working memory study all the way to the subcellular level. These studies inspired many recent imaging studies on human working memory. I presented a poster on the imaging project that I worked on with Alex Martin and Jim Haxby, NIMH, and Raja, titled: "fMRI of face working memory using rapid and random stimulus presentation".

I enjoyed New Orleans, its unique attraction, food, and jazz. Yet, with several sizable conferences going on at the same time, it was a bit crowded to my liking. The next annual meeting will be held in Los Angeles, November 7-12, 1998; check http://www.sfn.org for further information.

REPORT ON 38TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY..........

Yang Jiang

Raja and Yang attended the 38th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Philadelphia, November 20-23 . The Psychonomic Society is a prestigious society whose members are accomplished psychologists. A Ph.D. in psychology alone is not enough for membership. During the meeting, our poster "Effects of Visual Motion Priming In Young and Older Adults", by Raja, Yang, Pam, and Camilla was well received.

On a personal note, while in Philadelphia, I met another Professor Parasuraman (Raja's sister Saroj) and stayed at her house. Incidently, I found that she just won a best writing award at a major conference, had a new book in her field published, and she is a great cook. Do all these sound amazingly familiar to you?

For your information: The Psychonomic Society's next annual meeting will be held in Dallas, Texas, November 19-22, 1998. For more information, see http://www.sig.net/~psysoc/about.cfm.

LAB SYSTEMS MANAGER'S REPORT..........

Tony Masalonis

In recent months, the CSL has seen additions and improvements in the software and networking departments. We've been keeping up with Apple's operating system updates, as most of the desktop Macs in the lab are now running OS 8.x. Important additions to our software library are the newest Mac-OS and Windows versions of the SPSS statistical programs. Also, following a resurgence in the CSL of the ever-loving macro viruses, we've added the latest SAM (Symantec Antivirus for Macintosh) to our collection of virus protection programs.

In October, our lab's computers got a little more breathing room on our little section of the CUA network, with the addition of ten new Internet addresses. Also, most of our networked computers are now connected to the new campus fiber optic line. In other networking news, the CSL Web page (see notice below) now includes a counter to gauge our ever-increasing popularity. The counter, found at the bottom of the home page, measures the number of hits since January 12, 1998. Networking improvements for the near future include plans to install additional modem lines to allow multiple users to simultaneously dial into the CSL network. Armed with the correct phone numbers and passwords, it will be easier than ever to share files with lab Macs and PCs, and control computers remotely.

CSL NEWS..........

REMEMBERING......

Time for reflection...Toufik Bahri passed away last November 17 of cancer. Toufik came to The Catholic University of America as an MA student in the Fall of 1984 and started working as a Research Assistant in the Cognitive Science Lab in 1985. Accepted into the PhD Applied Experimental Program, he defended his dissertation on November 13, 1989. Following graduation, he continued in the Cognitive Science Lab as a post-doctoral Research Fellow until March 1991. After leaving the CSL, he accepted an assistant professorship at the Psychology Department, University of Algiers, Algeria. He later accepted a position at Psychology Department, University of El Ain, United Arab Emirates, where he remained with his wife Nafissa until his death in a hospital in Algiers. Dramatically, his father died the week before from a heart failure. As Toufik was athletic and did not smoke or drink alcohol, his untimely death came as a shock to his classmates Drs. Deaton and Mouloua. Both held a wake in his memory in December in Orlando, Florida. Toufik was 37 and survived by his wife, mother, brother, and two sisters. We send his family our sympathy and love.

WELCOME!

Our ever-expanding staff in the Cognitive Science Lab welcomes two new members. Alan Francis comes as post-doctoral Research Fellow in the area of cognitive neuroscience, specifically, brain imaging studies of attention in aging, at risk and Alzheimer patients. He will be working both here at the CSL and at NIH with Dr. Alex Martin. His junior research fellowship was at the Indian Institute of Technology; he was awarded a Felix Scholarship to study at Oxford University as visiting research student; and his PhD research was on the cognitive neuroscience of Alzheimer's disease at the Maudsley - Institute of Psychiatry, University of London. Besides working tirelessly here in the Lab, Alan is also preparing a home for the anticipated arrival of his wife and daughter who will be coming soon from India. Our newest research assistant Mary Roy is a sophomore psychology major, minoring in French. Originally from Detroit, Michigan, she is active at CUA as the captain of the varsity volleyball team, a member of the Kappa Tau Gamma service sorority, and a volunteer on a Washington, D.C. crisis hotline. Mary is working on Pam's NIA grant.

FAREWELL......

to Danielle Yates who has taken over the position as sophomore class senator in the Undergraduate Student Government, applied to be a Resident Assistant in one of the dorms on campus, and will be a volunteer on a hotline starting in April. She hopes to study abroad in Ireland for a semester. Good luck, Danielle!

ALUMNI UPDATES......

John Deaton: "It has been a fairly easy transition from a military career to that of corporate life. Ironically, two of the projects that I am currently working at CHI Systems were initiated with my help while I was on active duty in the Navy. Best of all, I get to work with many of the same people I did while on active duty. The major difference between military and civilian life is that I now have to make a most critical decision every morning that was not necessary while in the Navy...what do I wear today?!"

Evan Byrne: As of this writing, Evan is in Singapore as part of the NTSB team investigating the recent Silk Air crash. Other news: "we had our second kid, Cory Harrison Byrne on Friday 14 November. He was 8 lbs 4 oz at birth and is now doing quite well. Elliott has passive interest in the new guy and is not regressing any because he already wasn't toilet trained."

Brian Hilburn: Cassidy Madeline Hilburn was born 30 November, 1997, in The Hague, The Netherlands. Scheduled to be a 1998 baby, she decided to make her debut six weeks early weighing in at 2575 grams (5 lb 10 oz US) and 47 cm (18.5 in.) long. The whole enlarged family is doing well...

CURRENT RESEARCH......

SPATIALLY CUED VISUAL PROCESSING OVER THE ADULT LIFE SPAN, NIA (Pam Greenwood). Also related to the topic of visuospatial attention, in collaboration with Gene Alexander at NIH, we have obtained PET scans from young participants during performance of a visual search task. We hope to see in these scans evidence of active brain circuitry during processes of search. In addition, in collaboration with Trey Sunderland at NIMH, we have collected a large amount of data from individuals having first-degree relatives with Alzheimer Disease. These individuals are being genetically typed for possession of a combination of alleles associated with altered risk of that disease.

Scott Galster submitted a proposal entitled "Evaluation of Countermeasures for Performance Decrements due to Automation-Induced Complacency in IFR Rated General Aviation Pilots" as a Graduate Student Researchers Program grant to NASA Langley. The goal of the research proposed is to expand on studies conducted at the CSL on automation. This research will utilize the flight simulator to confirm the presence of automation-induced complacency and to evaluate the adaptive automation strategy as a countermeasure.

Stephanie Johnson is currently conducting a third follow-up study on cross modal auditory attention and aging. She is also working with traumatic brain injured patients using an ANAM database which computes RT's and accuracy data at Washington Hospital Center.

ADAPTIVE TASK ALLOCATION IN THE COCKPIT (NASA Langley) is nearing completion, and second-year funding has been received for the NASA Ames grant DYNAMIC AUTOMATION TOOLS FOR AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT. Data collection and analysis progresses on both projects.

PRESENTATIONS.........

Several lab members are working on presentations for various upcoming meetings. Look for reports in the next issue.

GUEST COLUMN..........Life in the "Real World"

John Deaton, PhD

My career has taken so many twists and turns that it's difficult to characterize it in so many words. We all strive for a professional career that both satisfies our financial needs and at the same time provides an environment that challenges us and allows us to pursue personal areas of interest. How we get there is another question. It's probably a combination of education, experience, and don't forget......LUCK! Be that as it may, I'd like to give the readers of this newsletter an idea of how these factors played into the shaping of my career since my days at CUA.

I was on active duty in the Navy when I started my academic training with Raja at CUA. I was fortunate in that I was "sponsored" by the military, i.e., they paid me my regular salary as an active duty officer as well as paying for all my tuition costs. The only catch was that I had two years in which to finish my Ph.D. (I had a Master's when I came to CUA). To make a long story short, I did finish within the prescribed time period (many sacrifices along the way), and continued my Navy career until I retired in 1995 in the Orlando area after 15 years of service as an Aerospace Experimental Psychologist.

What does one do after 15 years in a military environment? Well, one could go BACK to school--this time as faculty. Thus, I spent the year after retiring at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (Daytona Beach, FL) as a Senior Research Associate conducting aviation-related research in an academic environment that did not entirely understand how R&D really works (the Navy was an outstanding training ground for gaining this experience by the way). By that, I mean the University didn't understand that in order to attract research funds you need: 1) an adequate research facility or lab, 2) previous history of successful completion of funded research while not mandatory, is certainly helpful, 3) personnel with appropriate experience/background, etc., and 4) an administration that both appreciates and supports research efforts. In sum, while my short-lived academic career was moderately interesting, it became clear that opportunities for professional growth would be severely limited. Next step: look for another job (this was easy, given my background and experience). Finding a job is not too difficult, but finding the RIGHT job is. Well, I got half of it right! After four months working for Flight Safety International it became painfully obvious that I made a wrong decision. Not only was I not doing R&D anymore, but I was "urged" to develop curriculum guides/manuals for aircraft pilot training (someone needs to do it, but not me!). I made another concerted effort to find yet another position, and this time I was the right person at the right time (sound like luck may be playing a part here?). I applied for a position working for CHI Systems, Inc. (home-based in Philadelphia). They were looking for someone to open their Orlando operations (what luck!), and they knew me from past joint research efforts (luck again!).

This time I got it right! I'm back in R&D, and coincidentally, working with many of the same people I did while on active duty. Only this time, I have to decide what to wear each morning! (no more uniforms). Ironically, I'm working on two projects that I started during my active duty days. One of the projects is associated with designing an interface for helicopter aircrew that will assist them in assessing the health of their aircraft, and the other program involves the application of adaptive automation to integrate several emerging crewstation technologies (auto spin recovery, auto ejection, auto terrain avoidance, etc.).

Just to give you an idea of "real world" applications of some of the concepts we learned as grad students, I will now summarize a few of the programs developed at CHI. The following are descriptions of several efforts which involve cognitive and conceptual modeling of complex domains and the design of novel computer-based approaches to aid understanding and strategic decision-making (CHI does a lot of this stuff):

ORGNET -- Tool for Modeling and Analysis of Distributed Decision-Making Systems

The Navy is moving rapidly toward organizational structures which decentralize and distribute decision-making in both tactical and non-tactical environments. At the same time, such environments are becoming increasingly complex and thus require thorough analysis and design efforts before being implemented. This is a problem that calls for powerful, quantitative, and general methodologies that are practical enough to be applied directly and cost-effectively to Navy organizations. The Principal Investigator and colleagues at CHI Systems have created and demonstrated the COGNET methodology and GINA toolset for modeling and analyzing the decision/information needs of individual decision processes. Phase I addressed the feasibility of extending these methodologies to distributed decision making organizations. This extended COGNET methodology is termed ORGNET (for Organizational Network of Tasks) and the associated software for building and analyzing ORGNET models is termed PRO (Program for Redesigning Organizations). Ultimately, ORGNET/PRO will be used to: 1) Define a model of organizational functions; 2) Define individual role assignments; 3) Assess effectiveness of role assignments in terms of quantitative organizational performance measures. Results of Phase I indicated the feasibility of building the ORGNET/PRO methodology. Phase II will focus on building ORGNET/PRO and applying it to Aegis operations. Source of Funds: Naval Air Warfare Center, Training Systems Division.

Commander's Critical Information Requirements (CCIR) Software for USMC

As the USMC fields JMCIS, there is a danger that USMC commanders will be overwhelmed with the information provided by the system. CHI Systems' CCIR project deals with this problem, by providing the Commander with only the information that he truly needs for decision making. This project is a technology feeder for the NCCOSC Integrated Command Operations Center (ICOC) Advanced Technology Demonstration. In this project, CHI Systems developed CCIRs in conjunction with the MAGTF Staff Training Program office, a graphical user interface (GUI) to allow selection and changing of CCIRs, a message parser to extract critical information from formatted digital message traffic, and filters to determine when information meets CCIR requirements. The system also includes an alerting mechanism for CCIR matches. Later stages of the project will interface with a DARPA-developed natural language processing application for unformatted, free text digital messages such as OTH-Gold Opnotes and Lotus Notes. A prototype of the CCIR tool was demonstrated to the ICOC ATD Working Group on 23 November 1996, and a prototype participated in Operation Hunter Warrior (USMC portion of Army's Force XXI program) in February 1997. This project is now being transitioned to the USMC C4I software baseline as part of the JMCIS Ashore and C2PC systems. Source of Funds: Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center, San Diego, CA.

Development of Principles for Tactical Decision Making Under Stress: A Model-Based Approach

CHI Systems played a major role in the Navy's Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program, which began in 1990 and ended in 1995. The objective was to apply recent developments in decision theory, individual and team training, and information display to the problem of enhancing tactical decision quality under conditions of stress through development of principles for more effective decision support systems, man-machine interface concepts, and training strategies and techniques. The primary goal of CHI Systems project for the Naval Ocean Systems Center was to develop design principles for decision support systems and intelligent man-machine interfaces to aid Naval decision makers in stressful conditions. The first phase of this effort consisted of developing a COGNET model of ship self-defense (SSD) command decision making, then extending this model via human experiments to stressed decision making. In the second phase, the COGNET model of stressed decision making was used along with general design principles to construct an example decision aiding system for Naval SSD. Source of Funds: Naval Research and Development Center.

GINA - A Workbench for Developing User Interface Agents

Computerization of work, particularly information-based work which has been traditionally performed by manual methods, has created many problems for new computer users. As computer systems grow more complex, their human users have increasing difficulty in successfully and efficiently applying the underlying system functionality. Research has begun to focus on using the human-computer interface to solve such problems, by creating components of the user interface, called 'agents' or 'interface agents', that cooperatively support the human in a variety of ways. To date, however, these interface agents have been the custom-built products of individual research or system-development efforts. For the concept of interface agents to reach its broader potential, more powerful tools are needed for their development and maintenance. This research begins the development of a Generator of INterface Agents (GINA). GINA is developed around CHI Systems' interface agent-building methodology called COGNET. The project developed a detailed GINA architecture, and implemented and tested a skeletal version of the underlying agent-execution engine. Source of Funds: Naval Air Warfare Center, Training Systems Division.

Well, hopefully you get a pretty good picture of some of the projects that CHI has been involved in for the past few years. Obviously, they are quite technical and geared to real-world problems with military applications. As a general rule, organizations like CHI do not conduct fundamental research; that is best performed by universities like CUA. Once one leaves an academic environment, two things become clear: 1) the nature of your research becomes more applied, and 2) you become more knowledgeable concerning what areas are currently being funded by various agencies; this is important since you'll most likely be submitting proposals to secure funding to conduct your research. However, the payoffs in some respects, are greater outside of academia. You can participate in the development of real systems that may actually get fielded. Also, you may have opportunities to work on projects that involve sophisticated simulation and modeling on simulators worth millions of dollars (my Ph.D. dissertation was done at the CUA lab on a 286 PC!). But, you know, I never regret my time working in the lab. It gives you the tools that later prepare you to do the kind of work I've mentioned.

IN MY OPINION..........

Consumers Should Use Some Human Factors Common Sense

Jacqueline Duley

fuel gauge on empty It is often said that "human factors" is nothing more than common sense. Someone with human factors training will tell you that common sense will provide some basic use in everyday living but larger systems such as aircraft, buildings, automobiles, and software programs require a deeper understanding of the interaction between system and user. This is not to say however that a user cannot determine if a design allows for safe operation. For example we all know that controls should be reachable and we know that information should be displayed large enough so that it can be easily read. So if we already possess such common sense, why don't we use it when purchasing a product?

On October 12, 1997 John Denver fatally crashed his aircraft into Monterey Bay near Pacific Grove, California. Denver had recently purchased the homebuilt Long-EZ, an aircraft designed by Burt Rutan who is a well-known pilot, designer, and aviation enthusiast. Although the investigation is still in progress, a preliminary explanation by NTSB investigator George Petterson (GANews & Flyer, Nov. 14, 1997) is that a non-standard fuel selector valve in a non-standard location may have contributed to the crash. The builder had not followed the blueprints for the aircraft design. In purchasing this aircraft, Denver did not consider the significance of the location of the fuel selector control.

Controls should be reachable. The purpose of the fuel selector control in an aircraft is to switch from tank A to tank B for the aircraft's fuel supply. The significance of the location of such a control should seem obvious. If tank A is permitted to become empty and the pilot cannot switch to tank B-- no fuel, no fly! The fuel selector control in Denver's aircraft was located behind the would-be pilot's left shoulder instead of in front of the pilot. If Denver was to change fuel tanks, he had to "release his right hand from the Long-EZ's [flight] control stick, reach across and behind his left shoulder, and find the fuel selector to change tanks" (GANews & Flyer, Nov. 14, 1997). In fact, in order to either gain more leverage or extended reach, other pilots interviewed stated that Denver had borrowed a pair of vise grips.

Information should be displayed such that it can be easily read. In addition, the location of the aircraft's fuel quantity indicators may have also contributed to the fatal crash. The indicators were positioned on the sides of the cockpit, behind the front seat. Petterson stated that "the mechanic who helped Denver before takeoff loaned him a mirror so he could see the gauges" (GANews & Flyer, Nov. 14, 1997).

Knowing the above two facts, it should seem clear that operation of this aircraft could not be done in a safe manner. Without the ability to properly maintain the fuel supply, a pilot cannot fly the aircraft safely. Proper maintenance of the fuel supply requires knowledge of the fuel quantity which is obtained from the fuel gauges and the ability to continually provide the engine with fuel which is accomplished via control of the fuel selector.

As I mentioned earlier, the investigation is ongoing. There are other possible contributors to this fatal crash. Even if the fuel selector did not contribute to this crash, it may have been just a matter of time and circumstance. But I think that we can see this as an example of consumers -- Denver in purchasing the aircraft & the aircraft's builder in not following the purchased blueprints -- not using any human factors common sense.

READING FOR WORK..........

Enjoy Old Age. A Practical Guide by B. F. Skinner and M.E. Vaughan. As an aging person, a former Harvard professor of psychology offers specific pointers to making old age a time of considerable joy and productivity. (Camilla)

Images of Mind, by M. I. Posner & M. E. Raichle (1997). New York: Scientific American Library. Although the first edition of this book is already a couple of years old, I think it is still worth mentioning that the new edition (slightly modified) is available in affordable paperback now ($19.95). The print is in color and of good quality, too. A great introduction to cognitive neuroscience! (Ulla)

..........OR PLEASURE

The Sun Also Rises, by Ernest Hemingway. I especially enjoyed reading this a few months ago. It was pretty interesting since at the time it was published it was considered to accurately portray the lives of the younger generation after WWI. (Jackie)

Citizen Soldiers, by Steven Ambrose, an account of the battle for Normandy in the weeks after D-Day in 1944. Though I haven't actually finished this book, I still recommend it. Having read an account of this some years ago by Churchill's biographer, this book benefits from interviews with German survivors of the battle to give a fuller picture. Ambrose's thesis is that because of poor reconnaissance, the Allies were poorly trained and equipped for the hedgerow fighting that dominated the days and weeks following D-Day and solutions to the problems of fighting came, not from officers, but from the ingenious, enterprising "citizen soldiers" of the title; e.g., the New York City cab driver who devised a scheme to modify tanks by welding railroad track onto the front to ram into hedgerows. While providing a history of the battle for Normandy, Ambrose also celebrates the resourcefulness and pluck of the ordinary soldier. It also seems to me that the extensive experience that many of these kids (and they were kids) seem to have had with automobile engines gave them a big advantage in keeping the army moving. (Pam)

Long After Midnight, by Iris Johansen is a fast-paced thriller about genetic research. It is an easy-read and particularly enjoyable on a rainy night, a charming romance. (Jennie)

COOL WEB SITES

Ulla: http://www.interactive.hp.com/fish/

Have you ever seen a fish expressing his affection for you? Unfortunately, for PC people only!

Pam: http://igm.nlm.nih.gov:80/

On-line version of "Grateful Med" - the Medline search facility which allows on line searching of the National Library of Medicine's Medline data base - one can search for journal articles by author, subject, etc.

Scott: http:/www.versiontracker.com

Keep track of the latest available version of software available for the mac; also allows you to or directs you to places where you can download software (some free; some listed for purchase).

Tony: til.info.apple.com

Apple Technical Info Library, info about common Mac problems and how to fix some of them.

Tony: Cheap flights! Many airlines offer discounted fares only available on the internet. The best are the following four, because they also allow you to sign up for weekly e-mail notifications of last-minute discounts, so the info comes to you rather than YOU going to get IT.

American (www.aa.com), Continental (www.flycontinental.com), TWA (www.twa.com), and US (www.usairways.com).

www1.tip.nl/~t684359/cassidy.cfm

The Cassidy Madeline Hilburn home page.

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

March 25-28, 1998
Third Automation Technology and Human Performance Conference
Norfolk, Virginia

April 5-7, 1998
Cognitive Neuroscience Society
San Francisco, California

April 23-26, 1998
Cognitive Aging Conference
Atlanta, Georgia

May 21-24, 1998
American Psychological Society
10th Annual Convention
Washington, D.C.

May 27-29, 1998
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics
Montreal, Canada

June 7-12, 1998
4th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Brain
Montreal, Canada

October 5-9, 1998
Human Factors & Ergonomics Society
Chicago, Illinois
Lecture proposals due March 9
Poster proposals due April 20

November 7-12, 1998
Society for Neuroscience
Los Angeles, California

NEW PUBLICATIONS..........

Jiang, Y., Pantle, A.J., & Mark, L.S. (In Press). Visual inertia of rotating 3D objects. Perception and Psychophysics.

Parasuraman, R. (Ed.) (In Press). The Attentive Brain. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.

Wickens, C. D., Mavor, A., Parasuraman, R., & Mcgee, J. (1998). The Future of Air Traffic Control. Human Operators And Automation In Air Traffic Control. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

SCHEDULED WEDNESDAY TALKS

Dec 3, Dennis Rowe, Mitre Corporation, "Heart Rate Variability and Mental Workload in Free Flight"
Dec 10, First Annual CSL Holiday Luncheon
Jan 14, New semester orientation
Jan 21, Raja Parasuraman, "Unconscious Priming of Visual Objects?"
Jan 28, Pamela Greenwood, "Spatial Attention in Healthy Elderly at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease"
Feb 4, Raja Parasuraman, "Neuroergonomics"
Feb 11, No Meeting
Feb 18, No Meeting
Feb 25, Allyson Rosen, "On Constructing fMRI Experiments: Some Examples"
Mar 4, Alan Francis, "Education and Semantic Memory in Dementia"
Mar 11, Mike Miller, "Specificity and Semantic Spread of Inhibition in the Stroop Task"
Mar 18, Alex Martin, NIH, "fMRI and Repetition Priming"
Mar 25, 3rd Automation Technology Conference, no meeting
Apr 1, Yang Jiang, "Visual Motion Priming and Aging"
Apr 8, Tony Masalonis, "Effects of a Conflict Probe on Controller Performance"
Cognitive Science Lab Home Page